It is really interesting where the 2/20 structure comes from, as it is in effect one of the most impressives pieces of pricing for a strange type of product.
Read Moreinvesting
German Software Stocks - Financial Analysis Intro
As stated previously I will analyse German Software companies. Most financial information is meaningless to me for the purpose of arriving at an attractive price. I can of course compile benchmarks and understand why current coverage, cash cycle theoretically matter but I don’t feel comfortable with it.
What I will do instead is put a value on the whole business then divide that by the number of shares. That will give me the price that I’d be willing to pay for more shares.
But, before I do this I want to share my approach so that I do the same thing for all companies and can improve. This is also written fast and based on common sense. I write we because I own a share of each company.
I will keep this part purely financial, some of the questions serve as preparation for qualitative research or asking the management.
Questions I want answers to:
- Does selling the current products make more cash than it costs to make them?
- Are there more customers for the products with similar acquisition costs in the future?
- Have less people bought our products in the lastly?
- Are we making a lot of investments?
- Have we made a lot of investments in the past?
- How good have the past investments been?
Definition of “Investment” and “Investment” in the context of Software businesses
An “investment” is something that you do today to generate cash in the future. If it does not generate cash it was a bad investment. But, if it does generate cash it is not automatically a good investment. Because it could also not be an investment at all.
Example: If I am in the business of selling balloons on the Oktoberfest, than the thing to put gas into the balloon is not an investment. Yes, it generates cash. Yes, it is re-used when there is gas filled it. But if I buy a new one, I cannot tell my investors that I have “invested” in something. The new gas thing will not generate more revenue at the next Octoberfest, it will just allow me to do any revenue.
Normally, I would expect to find the “investments” in the assets on the balance sheet. Now, in case of software, most likely there will not be an asset on the balance sheet but I expect it to be somewhere on the incoming statement - hidden as labour costs.
Enough theory, let’s start
I feel there has been too much theory from me. I will start and later come back to this article. The questions above still stand.
Share price experiment
Having spend a lot of time on thinking what makes a product profitable, I am not spending more time thinking about what business do. Less on the venture capital side, more on the value investment side. In this article I set the context for a number of analysis that I want to do.
Read MoreAnalysis: Constellation Software (TSX: CSU) /P1
This is an investing post. I am looking at constellation software (TSX: CSU), a company that has come up multiple times in the past months in podcasts/twitter/blog posts. Writing this as I am educating myself.
Read MoreIs Michael Porter wrong?
I am trying a new way of writing. Live commenting on the me reading a piece about Michael Porter, the author of competitive advantage and general strategy genius. The foundation for this is the piece "The Gospel According to Michael Porter" from the magazine Institutional Investor.
Read MoreFavourite Podcasts - Product, Investing, Economics, History and Politics - February 2018
A review of which podcast in product management, investing, history and politics I am currently listening to. Plus, personal statistics of podcast consumptions.
Read MoreCorporate Boards / Initial Thoughts /p1
Recently, two papers have increased my interested in corporate board members: "The Case for Professionell Boards" and "Boards-R-Us: Reconceptualizing Corporate Boards". This posts is my first in a series on board members.
Read More